The announcement of the creation of the Hexagon World Series, team circuit officially governed by the International Federation of Padel (FIP), was carefully presented as a complementary building block of the existing ecosystem, alongside the FIP Tour and Premier Padel.
The press release dwells at length on one specific point: the Hexagon World Series will not compete with Premier Padel...

This is surprisingly precise, given that the two competitions do not operate on the same playing field.
One is individually, in pairs, the other collectively, by teamsOn paper, therefore, there is no direct competition.

However, a silence is striking.

Team circuits… absent from the press release

While the press release takes the time to clarify the coexistence with Premier Padel, No line is devoted to the other team circuits already established in the world padel scene.However, these competitions now occupy a far from marginal place.

The most iconic is undoubtedly the Pro Padel League, launched in 2023.
Based on a closed league modelThe PPL brings together ten franchises located in North America, including Miami Padel Club, the New York Atlantics, the San Diego Stingrays or the Toronto Polar Bears.

The circuit operates according to a highly structured logic:

  • a season consisting of three major continental stages,
  • un All-Star event,
  • and City's Cup Finals.

The matches are played in mixed teams, with a large presence of players from the circuit Premier PadelThe proposed law relies on powerful investors, a narrative similar to American sports leagues, and a strong business orientation.

A model very far removed from European federal logic… but one that works.

What is the real impact of the FIP circuit on the Pro Padel League?

The central question, therefore, is not whether the Hexagon World Series competes Premier Padel — the press release already addressed this, even though it didn't seem necessary.
The real question concerns the future of the Pro Padel League against a team circuit officially supported by the FIP.

In the short term, the PPL appears firmly established. Its North American roots, the strength of its investors, and its closed format provide it with considerable stability. It would therefore be an exaggeration to announce its imminent demise.

But one point could quickly become decisive: the ability to mobilize the players.

When the world's best players are offered, on the one hand, a team circuit FIP labelOn the one hand, integrated into the official calendar, and on the other, a private league outside the federal fold, the question of sporting and contractual priority inevitably arises.

As usual, Money remains the lifeblood of war..
While the Hexagon World Series offers lower prize money than the PPL, the American circuit will retain a clear competitive advantage. Conversely, if the FIP manages to establish a solid business model, the situation could change rapidly.

The World case Padel League and the geopolitical equation

La World Padel League finds itself in a slightly different situation.
Launched in Dubai, the WPL relies more on a event format, very entertainment-oriented, with international teams and premium staging.

But here again, the launch of a team circuit officially supported by the FIP raises questions.
Especially since, at the same time, Premier PadelBacked by Qatar, it is strengthening its grip on global professional padel. Indirectly, the creation of the Hexagon World Series can also be interpreted as a rebalancing of regional forceswhere Doha consolidates its position against Dubai in the field of high-level padel.

Behind the rhetoric, a very business-oriented reality

The official statement speaks of structuring, complementarity, and an ecosystem. But behind this rhetoric, the reality is crystal clear: Business is more than ever at the heart of professional padel.

Across the Hexagon World Series, the FIP and Premier Padel send a clear message:
the leading team circuit, internationally recognized, will be the one supported by the federation.

The other leagues/circuits are not being directly attacked. They are simply being presented with a choice:
adapt, coexist… or evolve sustainably outside the federal sphere.

This situation is reminiscent, in a way, of the period of confrontation between the World Padel Tour and its former partner (the FIP), which had ultimately withdrawn its support in favor of QSI and Premier Padel.
Even though the context and the stakes are different, one element clearly stands out: The support of the international body carries considerable symbolic weight.capable of profoundly influencing the padel ecosystem.

Furthermore, it is noted that the FIP remains faithful to a guiding principle of wanting manage directly what is possible, or reduce the number of existing structures and circuits, rather than relying on them.
Rather than supporting and strengthening existing initiatives, the federation seems to favor a logic of to disregard the existing system in order to launch one's own projects.

In this game of musical chairs, The Hexagon World Series is a major strategic pieceAnd what if the end of the Pro Padel League or World Padel The League is not a done deal; their future now lies in a much more competitive and institutionalized environment.

Franck Binisti

Franck Binisti discovered padel at the Club des Pyramides in 2009 in the Paris region. Since then, padel has been part of his life. You often see him touring France to cover major French padel events.